It appears there's not a need to roundtrip through email to verify, so.. like: userid: bernhard.ebb...@wcom.com passwd: pickagreatonehere
and.. go along to the map to do your searchings ? On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:26 PM Mehmet Akcin <meh...@akcin.net> wrote: > > We've tried this, disabled google because the spam came from 1000s of Gmail > accounts actually, also had the same issue with Facebook end disabled that.. > it's not like we are not trying to solve this, one idea was to create an > account demo/demo and let people just login with that without requiring > registration but then the problem is we have no way of tracking buy capacity > requests... i am sure we just need a web developer help us ;) thinking this > as network engineer isn't really the best way to come up with a solution > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:13 AM Alain Hebert <aheb...@pubnix.net> wrote: >> >> Well, >> >> I think some are "way too angry" over this. >> ( I think there is more pressing issues to get angry about first, don't >> you think? ) >> >> Like the Mehmet said, that's the solution implemented at the moment. >> While my plate being full, Google reCcaptcha v3, could be a easy fix for >> someone with some time on its hand. >> >> Or why not simply Joe Doe the form with a throwaway email instead... >> >> Happy friday. ( Its friday right? ) >> >> ----- >> Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net >> PubNIX Inc. >> 50 boul. St-Charles >> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 >> Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 >> >> On 2020-07-24 11:12, Tom Hill wrote: >> >> On 24/07/2020 15:58, Mehmet Akcin wrote: >> >> Infrapedia is 100% free , all code open source, platform made for >> engineers by engineers. >> https://github.com/infrapedia >> >> I am sure there are lots of room to improve. I appreciate everyone >> supporting it. If you want to look at the code and help implement a way >> to block spam bots, without overloading the system, I would be >> interested to help. >> >> No we will never share email, name, etc. >> >> Be more up-front then. Every opinion I've expressed has been from >> opening the URL from the link and not liking what has happened when I've >> tried to use the site. >> >> As it stands this does not look like a good for the Internet website >> ("for engineers by engineers") in the same vein as Wikipedia, PeeringDB, >> etc., and it's less functional than the other cable maps because of the >> forced redirects. >> >> It looks (and sounds from this thread) as a way to net some referral >> bank on inquiries to these "partners", whom also apparently dictate how >> you structure the site, and how you collect personal data. >> >>
