It appears there's not a need to roundtrip through email to verify, so.. like:
  userid: bernhard.ebb...@wcom.com
  passwd: pickagreatonehere

and.. go along to the map to do your searchings ?

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:26 PM Mehmet Akcin <meh...@akcin.net> wrote:
>
> We've tried this, disabled google because the spam came from 1000s of Gmail 
> accounts actually, also had the same issue with Facebook end disabled that.. 
> it's not like we are not trying to solve this, one idea was to create an 
> account demo/demo and let people just login with that without requiring 
> registration but then the problem is we have no way of tracking buy capacity 
> requests... i am sure we just need a web developer help us ;) thinking this 
> as network engineer isn't really the best way to come up with a solution
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:13 AM Alain Hebert <aheb...@pubnix.net> wrote:
>>
>>     Well,
>>
>>     I think some are "way too angry" over this.
>>     ( I think there is more pressing issues to get angry about first, don't 
>> you think? )
>>
>>     Like the Mehmet said, that's the solution implemented at the moment.  
>> While my plate being full, Google reCcaptcha v3, could be a easy fix for 
>> someone with some time on its hand.
>>
>>     Or why not simply Joe Doe the form with a throwaway email instead...
>>
>>     Happy friday.  ( Its friday right? )
>>
>> -----
>> Alain Hebert                                aheb...@pubnix.net
>> PubNIX Inc.
>> 50 boul. St-Charles
>> P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
>> Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
>>
>> On 2020-07-24 11:12, Tom Hill wrote:
>>
>> On 24/07/2020 15:58, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>>
>> Infrapedia is 100% free , all code open source, platform made for
>> engineers by engineers.
>> https://github.com/infrapedia
>>
>> I am sure there are lots of room to improve. I appreciate everyone
>> supporting it. If you want to look at the code and help implement a way
>> to block spam bots, without overloading the system, I would be
>> interested to help.
>>
>> No we will never share email, name, etc.
>>
>> Be more up-front then. Every opinion I've expressed has been from
>> opening the URL from the link and not liking what has happened when I've
>> tried to use the site.
>>
>> As it stands this does not look like a good for the Internet website
>> ("for engineers by engineers") in the same vein as Wikipedia, PeeringDB,
>> etc., and it's less functional than the other cable maps because of the
>> forced redirects.
>>
>> It looks (and sounds from this thread) as a way to net some referral
>> bank on inquiries to these "partners", whom also apparently dictate how
>> you structure the site, and how you collect personal data.
>>
>>

Reply via email to