On 11/Jun/20 16:36, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > Case in point. > > On the other hand not sure if any of the customers would care whether LSPs > are signalled over v4 as opposed to v6. They care if your core router CPU doesn't struggle from dealing with churning BGP routes at scale, taking the network down. Not every bit of good network operation can be attributed to direct revenue. BCP-38 is a great example, and that is still poorly deployed despite being supported. Mark.
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Randy Bush
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka