On 11/Jun/20 15:34, Saku Ytti wrote: > > Unsure of others, but we didn't implement RPKI for shit and giggles, > we implemented it, because customers wanted us to do RPKI. I'll be honest, none of our customers ever asked us to deploy RPKI and ROV. Will they benefit from it, sure? Is it about to become part of an RFP requirements document? Probably not. Then again, the typical NTT customer probably has an engineering department that understands and demands RPKI, because they are a sizeable operator themselves. We only have a handful of customers that technically appreciate that we've deployed RPKI. For the rest, it doesn't register. Not sure if beating up on Job for months qualifies as "a customer wanting RPKI from NTT" :-). Mark.
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Randy Bush
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- RE: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka