On 11/Jun/20 09:42, Saku Ytti wrote: > > I don't like to conflate these two; SR is great, SRv6 is horrible > abomination. SR is what MPLS should have been day1, but it probably > was easier to market LDP than to say 'we need to change all IGP > protocols'. Fair point. Mark.
- LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti