On 10/Jun/20 21:36, Phil Bedard wrote: > In its simplest form without TE paths, there isn't much to SRv6. You use a > v6 address as an endpoint and a portion of the address to specify a specific > VPN service. You completely eliminate the label distribution protocol. A BGPv6-free core is a decent use-case for us. Much simplicity has been enjoyed by removing that in the IPv4 world. Mark.
- LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Tim Durack
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard
- Re: LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check Phil Bedard