I could never get LACP + tagged VLANs to work on SwOS. Then again, it doesn't work reliably on RouterOS either, so I gave up. Spending more on hardware that is well supported is worth it versus my time and sanity.
I think Ubiquiti pretty much has the "cheap hardware that works well, but commercial support lacking" market cornered. thanks, -Randy ----- On May 18, 2020, at 5:43 PM, nanog <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > Yep, run SwichOS, prevents you from running things in software. š > Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP > Certified > Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Editionā > Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services > Office : 314-735-0270 Website: [ http://www.linktechs.net/ | > http://www.linktechs.net ] > Create Wireless Coverageās with [ > https://zimbra.network1.net/zimbra/www.towercoverage.com | > www.towercoverage.com ] > From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 4:37 PM > To: Mauro Gasparini <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Switch for SFP+ > That's a downfall of Mikrotik, they give you ultimate power. You can do some > pretty atypical things on there. > ----- > Mike Hammett > [ > https://imsva91-ctp.trendmicro.com/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ics%2dil.com&umid=B47E9451-A5F3-0D05-8BDE-9FDBD4B4C161&auth=079c058f437b7c6303d36c6513e5e8848d0c5ac4-285b59a47041a35803b05fa3a991e89443b374c5 > | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] > [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL ] [ > https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb ] [ > https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions ] [ > https://twitter.com/ICSIL ] > [ http://www.midwest-ix.com/ | Midwest Internet Exchange ] > [ https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix ] [ > https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange ] [ > https://twitter.com/mdwestix ] > [ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/ | The Brothers WISP ] > [ https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [ > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg ] > From: "Mauro Gasparini" < [ mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com | > mjgaspar...@gmail.com > ] > > To: [ mailto:nanog@nanog.org | nanog@nanog.org ] > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 1:45:59 PM > Subject: Re: Switch for SFP+ > It's clear then that I must use "bridge vlan" to achieve the goal I am looking > for. > Now it's time for me to study, research and test on my side. > If I have any specific questions, I will draw on your experience. > Thanks a lot. > El 15/5/20 a las 22:11, Travis Garrison escribiĆ³: >> On the CRS 3xx line, use vlan filtering instead. This guarantees hardware >> offloading. >> PS. Do not use this method on the 1xx or 2xx lines. >> /interface bonding >> add mode=802.3ad name=bond-inet slaves=ether9,ether10,ether8 >> transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3 >> /interface bridge >> add name=bridge vlan-filtering=yes >> /interface bridge port >> add bridge=bridge interface=bond-inet >> add bridge=bridge interface=sfp1 >> /interface bridge vlan >> add bridge=bridge tagged=bond-inet,sfp1 vlan-ids=201 >> Thanks >> Travis >> From: NANOG [ mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org | <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> ] On >> Behalf Of Mauro Gasparini >> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:55 AM >> To: [ mailto:nanog@nanog.org | nanog@nanog.org ] >> Subject: Re: Switch for SFP+ >> This works well on my CRSs: >> /interface bonding >> add mode=802.3ad name=bond-inet slaves=ether9,ether10,ether8 >> transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3 >> /interface bridge port >> add bridge=br-cabase interface=bond-inet >> add bridge=br-cabase interface=sfp1 >> But if I want to bridge vlans behind some bonding Instead of bridging phy >> interfaces, cpu explodes: >> /interface vlan >> add name=vl201-mmen vlan-id=201 interface=sfp1 >> add name=vl201-mment vlan-id=201 interface=bond-inet >> /interface bridge port >> add bridge=br-mment interface=vl201-mmen >> add bridge=br-mment interface=vl201-mment >> El 15/5/20 a las 12:06, Mike Hammett escribiĆ³: >>> [ https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS3xx_series_switches#Bonding | >>> https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS3xx_series_switches#Bonding ] >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> [ >>> https://imsva91-ctp.trendmicro.com/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ics%2dil.com&umid=B47E9451-A5F3-0D05-8BDE-9FDBD4B4C161&auth=079c058f437b7c6303d36c6513e5e8848d0c5ac4-285b59a47041a35803b05fa3a991e89443b374c5 >>> | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] >>> [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL ] [ >>> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb ] [ >>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions ] [ >>> https://twitter.com/ICSIL ] >>> [ http://www.midwest-ix.com/ | Midwest Internet Exchange ] >>> [ https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix ] [ >>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange ] [ >>> https://twitter.com/mdwestix ] >>> [ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/ | The Brothers WISP ] >>> [ https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [ >>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg ] >>> From: "Mauro Gasparini" [ mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com | >>> <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> >>> ] >>> To: [ mailto:nanog@nanog.org | nanog@nanog.org ] >>> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 8:55:22 AM >>> Subject: Re: Switch for SFP+ >>> Thanks. I am currently using CRS326-24G-2S+ (with routerOS) for this, but >>> when I >>> want to do vlan trunking through the bonding, cpu load grows from 3% to more >>> than 90%. >>> I'm consulting Mikrotik's support in the meantime, because routerOS probably >>> doesn't take advantage of the switch hardware as swOS would. >>> El 15/5/20 a las 10:03, Alain Hebert escribiĆ³: >>>> Hi, >>>> Mikrotik is a decent product and I'm always amazed at their features set, >>>> but... >>>> Using the UI to configuring the switch will punt too much traffic toward >>>> the >>>> CPU. However, it is possible to configure the switch fabric with the cli >>>> and >>>> attain the desired results. >>>> It does not compare to a JNP QFX5100 or a Extreme Network x650, x670... >>>> etc. >>>> ----- >>>> Alain Hebert [ mailto:aheb...@pubnix.net | aheb...@pubnix.net ] >>>> PubNIX Inc. >>>> 50 boul. St-Charles >>>> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 >>>> Tel: 514-990-5911 [ http://www.pubnix.net/ | http://www.pubnix.net ] Fax: >>>> 514-990-9443 >>>> On 2020-05-14 15:11, Adam Thompson wrote: >>>>> Have you actually looked at Mikrotik switches? I don't like the OS, but >>>>> the >>>>> hardware does what you want it to. >>>>> [ >>>>> https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r=%7b%22sfp_plus_interface%22:%7b%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22%7d%7d#! >>>>> | >>>>> https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r={%22sfp_plus_interface%22:{%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22}}#! >>>>> ] >>>>> If necessary, buy your SFP modules from FS.com and get them coded as >>>>> Mikrotik >>>>> modules at the factory - that's what we do for Cisco, Brocade, Juniper, >>>>> Extreme, etc. >>>>> Even the top-of-the-line Mikrotik only costs US$899. >>>>> -Adam >>>>> Adam Thompson >>>>> Consultant, Infrastructure Services >>>>> 100 - 135 Innovation Drive >>>>> Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8 >>>>> (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) >>>>> [ mailto:athomp...@merlin.mb.ca | athomp...@merlin.mb.ca ] >>>>> [ http://www.merlin.mb.ca/ | www.merlin.mb.ca ] >>>>> From: NANOG [ mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org | <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> >>>>> ] on >>>>> behalf of Mauro Gasparini [ mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com | >>>>> <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> ] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 8:46:21 AM >>>>> To: Mehmet Akcin >>>>> Cc: nanog >>>>> Subject: Re: Switch for SFP+ >>>>> Thank you. The problem is that to get a price lower than U$D 3000 I have >>>>> to >>>>> resort to a used device. >>>>> El 14/5/20 a las 01:08, Mehmet Akcin escribiĆ³: >>>>>> Used Juniper QFX5100-48T will do it. Probably overkill but you can grab >>>>>> one >>>>>> cheap @ebay >>>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 16:36 Mauro Gasparini < [ >>>>>> mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com | >>>>>> mjgaspar...@gmail.com ] > wrote: >>>>>>> Good afternoon. >>>>>>> I'm looking for a switch with the following capabilities: >>>>>>> . transport for more than 20 gbps >>>>>>> . link aggregation LACP >>>>>>> . slots for SFP+ >>>>>>> . seamlessly when trunking vlans through the link aggregation. >>>>>>> And essentially that doesn't exceed US$D 2000 and is compatible with >>>>>>> 10GBASE-ER and/or 10GBASE-ZR modules that are not from the vendor itself >>>>>>> (e.g. SPFs: Huawei, Mikrotik, Sumitomo, OEMs). >>>>>>> If any of you have a good experience with a device that meets these >>>>>>> requirements (which are minimal with the exception of price and >>>>>>> compatibility) ? >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>> Mauro Gasparini >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Mehmet >>>>>> +1-424-298-1903
