It's clear then that I must use "bridge vlan" to achieve the goal I am
looking for.
Now it's time for me to study, research and test on my side.
If I have any specific questions, I will draw on your experience.
Thanks a lot.
El 15/5/20 a las 22:11, Travis Garrison escribió:
On the CRS 3xx line, use vlan filtering instead. This guarantees
hardware offloading.
PS. Do not use this method on the 1xx or 2xx lines.
/interface bonding
add mode=802.3ad name=bond-inet slaves=ether9,ether10,ether8
transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3
/interface bridge
add name=bridge vlan-filtering=yes
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=bond-inet
add bridge=bridge interface=sfp1
/interface bridge vlan
add bridge=bridge tagged=bond-inet,sfp1 vlan-ids=201
Thanks
Travis
*From:* NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> *On Behalf Of *Mauro Gasparini
*Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2020 10:55 AM
*To:* nanog@nanog.org
*Subject:* Re: Switch for SFP+
This works well on my CRSs:
/interface bonding
add mode=802.3ad name=bond-inet slaves=ether9,ether10,ether8
transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3
/interface bridge port
add bridge=br-cabase interface=bond-inet
add bridge=br-cabase interface=sfp1
But if I want to bridge vlans behind some bonding Instead of bridging
phy interfaces, cpu explodes:
/interface vlan
add name=vl201-mmen vlan-id=201 interface=sfp1
add name=vl201-mment vlan-id=201 interface=bond-inet
/interface bridge port
add bridge=br-mment interface=vl201-mmen
add bridge=br-mment interface=vl201-mment
El 15/5/20 a las 12:06, Mike Hammett escribió:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS3xx_series_switches#Bonding
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Mauro Gasparini" <mjgaspar...@gmail.com>
<mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com>
*To: *nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
*Sent: *Friday, May 15, 2020 8:55:22 AM
*Subject: *Re: Switch for SFP+
Thanks. I am currently using CRS326-24G-2S+ (with routerOS) for
this, but when I want to do vlan trunking through the bonding, cpu
load grows from 3% to more than 90%.
I'm consulting Mikrotik's support in the meantime, because
routerOS probably doesn't take advantage of the switch hardware as
swOS would.
El 15/5/20 a las 10:03, Alain Hebert escribió:
Hi,
Mikrotik is a decent product and I'm always amazed at
their features set, but...
Using the UI to configuring the switch will punt too much
traffic toward the CPU. However, it is possible to configure
the switch fabric with the cli and attain the desired results.
It does not compare to a JNP QFX5100 or a Extreme Network
x650, x670... etc.
-----
Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net <mailto:aheb...@pubnix.net>
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 2020-05-14 15:11, Adam Thompson wrote:
Have you actually looked at Mikrotik switches? I don't
like the OS, but the hardware does what you want it to.
https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r={%22sfp_plus_interface%22:{%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22}}#!
<https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r=%7b%22sfp_plus_interface%22:%7b%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22%7d%7d#!>
If necessary, buy your SFP modules from FS.com and get
them coded as Mikrotik modules at the factory - that's
what we do for Cisco, Brocade, Juniper, Extreme, etc.
Even the top-of-the-line Mikrotik only costs US$899.
-Adam
*Adam Thompson*
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[MERLIN LOGO]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
athomp...@merlin.mb.ca <mailto:athomp...@merlin.mb.ca>
www.merlin.mb.ca <http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:*NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org>
<mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Mauro
Gasparini <mjgaspar...@gmail.com>
<mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2020 8:46:21 AM
*To:* Mehmet Akcin
*Cc:* nanog
*Subject:* Re: Switch for SFP+
Thank you. The problem is that to get a price lower than
U$D 3000 I have to resort to a used device.
El 14/5/20 a las 01:08, Mehmet Akcin escribió:
Used Juniper QFX5100-48T will do it. Probably overkill
but you can grab one cheap @ebay
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 16:36 Mauro Gasparini
<mjgaspar...@gmail.com <mailto:mjgaspar...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Good afternoon.
I'm looking for a switch with the following
capabilities:
. transport for more than 20 gbps
. link aggregation LACP
. slots for SFP+
. seamlessly when trunking vlans through the link
aggregation.
And essentially that doesn't exceed US$D 2000 and
is compatible with
10GBASE-ER and/or 10GBASE-ZR modules that are not
from the vendor itself
(e.g. SPFs: Huawei, Mikrotik, Sumitomo, OEMs).
If any of you have a good experience with a device
that meets these
requirements (which are minimal with the exception
of price and
compatibility) ?
Regards.
Mauro Gasparini
--
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903
