On 21/Apr/20 12:46, Randy Bush wrote: > essentially agree. my pedantic quibble is that i would like to > differentiate between the RPKI, which is a database, and ROV, which > uses it. And I think that is a very important distinction to be clear about. Right now, it's not completely arrest-worthy to use RPKI and ROV interchangeably, but I think considering that other use-cases might come from the database itself in the future, being explicit about it and how it can be used is appropriate pedantry. Mark.
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Amir Herzberg
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Job Snijders
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Saku Ytti
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Andrey Kostin
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?&qu... Randy Bush
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Sander Steffann
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Alex Band
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Christopher Morrow
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Rubens Kuhl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Danny McPherson