> On 30 Mar 2020, at 08:18, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 01:58, Ragnar Sundblad <ra...@kth.se> wrote:
> 
>> A protocol with varying packet size, as the NTS protected NTP is,
>> can easily have the bad property of having responses larger than the
>> requests if not taken care. Don’t you see that?
> 
> Why? Why not pad requests to guarantee attenuation vector until
> authenticity of packets can be verified?

Right, and NTS does that.

Ragnar

Reply via email to