> On 30 Mar 2020, at 08:18, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 01:58, Ragnar Sundblad <ra...@kth.se> wrote: > >> A protocol with varying packet size, as the NTS protected NTP is, >> can easily have the bad property of having responses larger than the >> requests if not taken care. Don’t you see that? > > Why? Why not pad requests to guarantee attenuation vector until > authenticity of packets can be verified? Right, and NTS does that. Ragnar
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad