On 3/30/2020 1:27 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 11:15, Harlan Stenn <st...@nwtime.org> wrote: > >> Please help me understand this. >> >> Exactly how bad is it if the query and response packets are of a >> different size? Does it matter at 4 bytes? 32? > > Presumably, if it's attenuation vector (1byte or more), presumably > attacker will use any of the other many vectors which are > amplification vectors or will directly attack from the zombie machines > they pwn. Since NST would have negative ROI on attack if there is > _any_ attenuation. OK, and exactly how bad is a single byte attenuation, when compared against the cost of 100% of all of the 1-byte shorter NTP packets being made bigger to make the attenuation vector 0? -- Harlan Stenn <st...@nwtime.org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn