Wasn’t that CNID where PRIs ignored the flag set not to present the data?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 15:01 <b...@theworld.com> wrote: > > On January 27, 2020 at 22:57 ma...@isc.org (Mark Andrews) wrote: > > The hardware support was 2B+D but you could definitely just use a > single B. 56k vs 64k depended on where you where is the world and which > style of ISDN the telco offered. > > FWIW bulk dial-up lines were often brought in as PRIs which were 24 > ISDN 2B+D lines on basically a T1 (1.544mbps) and then you could break > those out to serial lines. > > The sort of cool thing was that you could get caller information on > those even if the caller thought they blocked it with *69 or whatever > it was and log it. I forget the acronym...no no, that's the usual > caller-id this was...ummmm, DNI? Something like that. > > I won a court case with that data. > > -- > -Barry Shein > > Software Tool & Die | b...@theworld.com | > http://www.TheWorld.com > Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD > The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo* >
