Similar….

In ’93 I had a 2400bps modem and an $40/month ISP dialup account for 10 hours a 
month - my Mac IIci was zooming!

I quickly upgraded to 9600, then 14400, then 56k. I rocked the 56k till about 
2003 - mind you all my email was over telnet/ssh/pine and websites in 2003 
still worked somewhat well on 56k.

I tried getting ISDN in the late 90s, but at the time Bell Atlantic had 
horrible pricing for ISDN.

In those early days I remember setting up a download to start before bed so it 
could run all night, then wake up the morning to see my freshly downloaded 
300KB file — assuming the phone line remained stable.

-John


> On Jan 24, 2020, at 6:26 PM, Ben Cannon <b...@6by7.net> wrote:
> 
> I started what became 6x7 with a 64k ISDN line.   And 9600 baud modems…   
> 
> in ’93 or so.  (I was a child, in Jr High…)
> 
> -Ben.
> 
> 
> -Ben Cannon
> CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC 
> b...@6by7.net <mailto:b...@6by7.net>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 3:21 PM, b...@theworld.com <mailto:b...@theworld.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On January 24, 2020 at 08:55 aar...@gvtc.com <mailto:aar...@gvtc.com> (Aaron 
>> Gould) wrote:
>>> Thanks Jared, When I reminisce with my boss he reminds me that this 
>>> telco/ISP here initially started with a 56kbps internet uplink , lol
>> 
>> Point of History:
>> 
>> When we, The World, first began allowing the general public onto the
>> internet in October 1989 we actually had a (mildly shared*) T1
>> (1.544mbps) UUNET link. So not so bad for the time. Dial-up customers
>> shared a handful of 2400bps modems, we still have them.
>> 
>> * It was also fanned out of our office to a handful of Boston-area
>> customers who had 56kbps or 9600bps leased lines, not many.
>> 
>> -- 
>>        -Barry Shein
>> 
>> Software Tool & Die    | b...@theworld.com <mailto:b...@theworld.com>        
>>      | http://www.TheWorld.com <http://www.theworld.com/>
>> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
>> The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
> 

Reply via email to