> > > Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA that > says that IRR objects on IRR source x with maintainer Y are authoritative > for a given number resource. Kinda like SPF for BGP. > > > > Is this required? or a crutch for use until a network can publish all > of their routing data in the RPKI? > > It provides an adoption path based on the information already published in IRRs by operators for some years. It also covers for the fact that RPKI currently is only origin-validation.
Rubens
