On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:32 PM Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> RPKI ROAs (compared to IRR objects) carry different meaning: the existence >> of a ROA (both by definition and common implementation) supersedes other >> data sources (IRR, LOAs, or comments in whois records, etc), and as such can >> be used on any type of EBGP session for validation of the received Internet >> routing information. >> > > Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA that says > that IRR objects on IRR source x with maintainer Y are authoritative for a > given number resource. Kinda like SPF for BGP. >
Is this required? or a crutch for use until a network can publish all of their routing data in the RPKI? -chris
