On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:49 PM Ronald F. Guilmette <r...@tristatelogic.com> wrote: > > In message > <mn2pr17mb402947f79fd83abb9bbf429b9e...@mn2pr17mb4029.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>, > Martijn Schmidt <martijnschm...@i3d.net> wrote: > > >Hi Elad, > > > >If you were to create RPKI ROAs for the IPs in question... > > Thanks Martijn, for reminding me of a follow-up point that I had intended > to make regarding my recent post about the 143.95.0.0/16 (Athenix) block. > > RPKI is the best we have and I cannot wait for the day when it will see > universal deployment. But it isn't actually the 100% solution that > everyone has been hoping it would be. > > As the case of the 143.95.0.0/16 block illustrates, if the RIR has itself > been snookered into believing that party X actually owns party Y's block, > then that's it. Game over, and RPKI doesn't help, because if the
I really don't think this part of the problem matters. If a block is moved from one entity to another, that's it, nothing to be done/seen here. it's sad and someone should weep for the lost integers, but.. meh. The RIR abuse process can cleanup as required mr curran's notes about: "please send to fraud@" would apply here directly. -chris
