Netnanny is mostly sold for parents to put on their children's access.
You're not thinking this through.
Promote third-party curation, those who never want to see content they
find disturbing can PURCHASE* that service rather than bugging their
congressperson to demand that ISPs provide this for everyone for free
by law.
* No reason it couldn't be ad-supported but I hope you get my point.
On August 7, 2019 at 16:34 kmedc...@dessus.com (Keith Medcalf) wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 7 August, 2019 13:38, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> >I propose that the RIGHT THING TO DO would be to seek out, promote
> >(to >both customers and the public), and support various curation
> >services like netnanny.
>
> IANAP (I Am Not A Psychiatrist) however, persons who, when reading or
> hearing the words of others cannot control the images which leap, unbidden,
> into their minds causing them to offend themselves or otherwise instill in
> themselves a self-created state of distress, should, IMHO, seek professional
> help from a trained and certified mental health professional who may be able
> to help them overcome their mental disability either through psychotherapy
> or the administration of psychoactive drugs.
>
> I do not think NetNanny is a certified mental health professional in any
> jurisdication -- at least not those within the NANOG region.
>
> --
> The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
> lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
>
>
>
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
