In article <23868.39953.398906.559...@gargle.gargle.howl> you write: >Not particularly interested in arguing for using Class E space but >this "not compatible" reasoning would seem to have applied to IPv6 in >the early 2000s (whatever, pick an earlier date when little supported >IPv6) just as well, pretty much.
Right. A point that's been made about a hundred times already is that the effort to add class E to the IPv4 space is the same as the effort to support IPv6, so why waste time with class E? R's, John
