Ummmmm.. no.  I can't speak for the others on this list who were
effected like us - but we take this stuff very seriously and
respectively you would too *if* you had a previous legit issue that
appeared to the same **on the surface**.  A cautious and indepth look at
this was taken upon us hoping that history wasn't repeating itself
(previously explained) and thankfully it wasn't ... but until the time
is spent to make absolutely sure how do you know??

At the end of the day, it wasn't a serious operational issue but raised
a number of concerns I believe....

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:37 PM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24


On 13 Jan 2009, at 15:32, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

> On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>>> Were the victim
>>
>> Heh, if only there was any sign of a victim.
>
> The guy who spent time & effort investigating why his AS was misused
> announced it here.  I'd call that at least a sign.

I'd call it a sign that people need to be more selective about what
they spend their time reacting to, and that pretty much wraps up the
operational content of this thread, as far as I can see. Bring back
the haikus!


Joe






----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy 
this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or 
disclosing same. Thank you."

Reply via email to