-------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ----------- From: "Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think this goes back to my point about DHCP, today there is a business practice and set of business requirements that work for a host of reasons. Expecting that in v6 these requirements will evaporate is not wise. There will have to be some useful TE knobs, I think the operations community would probably like to see those knobs NOT be 'deaggragate' so what other options are there for someone with a single prefix (especially when that prefix is very large). ----------------------------------------------------- I just want to echo agreement with Chris' repeated comments (but seemingly unanswered as of yet) on these issues. scott
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customer... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cus... Christopher Morrow
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cus... Christopher Morrow
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line... Christopher Morrow
- IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendatio... Deepak Jain
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recom... Martin Hannigan
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS r... Martin Hannigan
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line... Christopher Morrow
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased ... Simon Lyall
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cus... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cus... Scott Weeks
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cus... Brian Dickson
- Mailing list newbies suggestion Brian Dickson
- Re: Mailing list newbies suggestion Jim Popovitch
- RE: Mailing list newbies suggestion Joe Blanchard