If the mail is going to be illegible thanks to html, maybe it's appropriate to automate an illegible email rejected filter that adds a short message and bounces it back to the sender. If enough of these senders keep getting rejected messages maybe they'll clean up their acts but count on any start toward this taking at least 10 years from the time rejected email starts hitting their inboxes.
-- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940. On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, ckeader via Mutt-users wrote: > José María Mateos writes: > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 02:56:35PM +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > >Some considerate organisation has been sending me MIME mails with > > >content in a text/html section and a wholly blank text/plain version. > > >What I see in mutt is the blank text/plain. Who on Earth thought a > > >blank text/plain section was somehow a good idea? > > > > I've seen a worse version of this: the text version and the html version > > are completely different. > > I can better that, regularly spotted in the corporate environment: the > text/plain part is also in html. > >
