Derek Martin <inva...@pizzashack.org> wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022
at 13:39:42 EDT in <20220831173942.gb13...@bladeshadow.org>:

> It's been my experience that if you read your mail on anything other
> than a phone, the 72-character line width is fine, and even on a phone
> if you turn it sideways it's still fine.  My preferred solution, then,
> has been to stick with following the standards and assume that if you
> insist on reading mail on a hand-held device that can't accommodate
> the standard, and/or refuse to rotate it so that it can, then you get
> what you get, it's your choice and the consequences of your choice are
> on you.

That'd be true if we were sending emails to ourselves, but a lot of us send 
email to people who read their mail primarily or exclusively on phones and in 
desktop GUIs that don't approximate 72-chars.

What tends to happen is those people psychologically view hard-wrapped 72-char 
emails as ugly and they become a far less effective means of communication than 
other people's emails are, regardless of conscious choice.

It's great if you can choose the people who read your emails, but most of us 
are not so fortunate.

As for standards-compliance, that's a red herring. Long lines are not going to 
trip up any modern client, they're just not.

--
jh...@alum.mit.edu
John Hawkinson

Reply via email to