On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:50:35PM +0000, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > > > On April 26, 2018 8:24:16 PM UTC, Ian Zimmerman <i...@very.loosely.org> wrote: > > On 2018-04-25 10:24, Will Yardley wrote: > > > > > Kind of thread drift, but I actually wonder if Mutt shouldn't move > > > away from Mail-Followup-To, as it never became a standard, and is > > not > > > really adopted by (m)any other commonly used mail clients. > > > > It is supported by Gnus. I don't know of any others, and I wonder the > > same thing, because it seems to create at least some mischief. > > Seems also supported by Thunderbird > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Help_Documentation:Mail-Followup-To_and_Mail-Reply-To > and Roundcube https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/issues/1937
I always thought $followup_to was a pretty nice feature. While I sympathize with Matthias, the mischief was the result of misconfiguration, and Mutt requires nothing if not attention to the documentation and configuration. However, if there is a strong majority of mutt-users subscribers that agree with $followup_to defaulting to 'no', I'll make the change. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
