Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día miércoles, abril 25, 2018 a las 08:56:26p. m. +0200, Matthias Apitz > escribió: > >> El día miércoles, abril 25, 2018 a las 02:46:06p. m. -0400, Patrick Shanahan >> escribió: >> >>> then you have someone in your system makeing changes to your posts, >> >> the 'system' is a FreeBSD netbook using mutt+sendmail; >> >> I will Cc me on this mail to see its sent headers; > > The outgoing mails contains a header line: > > Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de>, mutt-users@mutt.org > > Who adds this? mutt by its own? If so, based on what?
Quoting http://mutt.org/doc/manual/#followup-to 3.72. followup_to Type: boolean Default: yes Controls whether or not the “Mail-Followup-To:” header field is generated when sending mail. When set, Mutt will generate this field when you are replying to a known mailing list, specified with the “subscribe” or “lists” commands. This field has two purposes. First, preventing you from receiving duplicate copies of replies to messages which you send to mailing lists, and second, ensuring that you do get a reply separately for any messages sent to known lists to which you are not subscribed. The header will contain only the list's address for subscribed lists, and both the list address and your own email address for unsubscribed lists. Without this header, a group reply to your message sent to a subscribed list will be sent to both the list and your address, resulting in two copies of the same email for you. That's why Kevin suggested setting 'subscribe' for the mutt list in your config. The 'honor_followup_to' variable is related, relevant for mutt users replying to messages with a 'Mail-Follup-To:' header. -- Todd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else. -- Fredric Bastiat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
