[Apologies if this turns out to be a dup. The email I sent yesterday appears to have been eaten by a grue.]
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:21:54PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:24:37PM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:44:29AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 08:17:02AM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote: > > > > From your statement above I understand your point clearly, I think a > > > > solution > > > > can be found and Debian tooling provides various alternatives, I will > > > > discuss > > > > the various options with a couple of people more expert than me on > > > > Debian > > > > packaging and I will come back to you, this can take up to 2 weeks in > > > > the worst > > > > case. > > > > > > Have you had a chance to do this yet? > > > > Yes, and this is why you haven't seen new releases to the Debian package > > (despite we had new releases in Neomutt). This is going to be fixed in > > August, I > > replied on the bug that you opened. > > Thank you for the update Antonio. I appreciate your work on resolving > this issue. This afternoon, Antonio uploaded the mutt-1.9.1 tarball as the Debian unstable mutt package, resolving the ticket I submitted. I'm sure this change will not be without controversy, but I just wanted to say thank you to Antonio for doing this. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
