The convention is to give a fork a new, different name. 
The neomutt fork did so by calling their project "neomutt".
So far so good. 

I'm surprised and disappointed to see that Debian as of now
has chosen to conflate the two projects and pollute the
namespace. 

Renaming Debian's "mutt" to "neomutt" will ensure that each
project receives the proper attribution and attention, and
ease triage.

Name squatting is silly and pointless. 

Kind regards,

Job

Reply via email to