Grant Edwards hat am Do 27. Apr, 20:04 (+0000) geschrieben: > On 2017-04-27, Patrick Shanahan <p...@opensuse.org> wrote: > > * Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> [04-27-17 11:21]: > >> On 2017-04-27, Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk> wrote: > >> > > >> >>OK, so how does one do that within mutt? > >> > > >> > I would suggest that the most prudent approach is to use a lightweight > >> > markup language (LML). LMLs tend to be designed such that, while they > >> > CAN be rendered into a presentation form, the source code is also > >> > (relatively) legible. > > [...] > > >> The question was how to do it _within_ _mutt_ instead of preparing an > >> HTML or PDF file externally and attaching it. > > > > *attaching* it *is* the way "_winthin_ _mutt_".
> But it would be cleaner if there was a way within mutt to run the > message body through such a filter to convert it into > multipart-alternative. That's my question, too. I thought of using the Attach pseudo header to append the "pretty" output. The editor could run markdown or latex on leaving and add the Attach: header with the file name. This has some flaws like the temporary file don't get removed or running it multiple times adds multiple attachments. Any better ideas? Jörg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature