* Xu Wang <xuwang...@gmail.com> [05-20-16 16:14]:
> procmail seems so useful and I do not know of a good replacement for
> some of its resources. I use the formail tool quite often.
>
> I find it strange that such a useful tool never gained a maintainer.
> Here is a useful message:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2
> but to me it explains why the author had to leave, not why no one picked it
> up.
>
> Is procmail fundamentally flawed or it is just that no one has found
> the time and love to commit to maintaining it again?
>
> Of course I do not judge. I have not done anything to help (except
> this complaint!). I am just curious.
>
> Please let me know if such an email is off-topic (I suppose this does
> not have direct relevance to mutt) and I will refrain from similar
> questions in the future.
There is a procmail list and there is traffic there:
List-Subscribe:
<http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail>,
<mailto:procmail-requ...@lists.rwth-aachen.de?subject=subscribe>
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
