On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:01:47AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 23May2014 19:08, Guy Gold <g...@merl.com> wrote:
> Confidential? Really? Only if you really want it to be...(send hooks, work in progress) > >Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:19:42PM EDT To mutt-users@mutt.o Display of > >threads, order in question > >Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:22:07PM EDT Cameron Simpson ├─> > >Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:54:23PM EDT To mutt-users@mutt.o │ └─> > >Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:37:48PM EDT Cameron Simpson │ └─> > >Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:19:11AM EDT To mutt-users@mutt.o │ └─> > >Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:22:54AM EDT David Champion │ └─> > >Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:15:05PM EDT To mutt-users@mutt.o │ └─> > >Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:05:13PM EDT David Champion │ └─> > >Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:50:55PM EDT To mutt-users@mutt.o │ └─> > >Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:14:20PM EDT Derek Martin └─> > > > > Suppose your message of 06:50PM was not yet arrived to the mailbox. > > That makes Derek's message of 4:14PM more recent than the most recent > message of the other subthread (David's, of 04:05PM). So Derek's _subthread_ > (one message long) is listed above _my_ subthread (running from 07:22PMmay22 > to David at 04:05PMmay23). So Derek's thread is listed first. > > Then your reply to my subthread arrived, and it makes that subthread "newer" > than Derek's. So that subthread moves up above Derek. > > Does this explain the behaviour? Yes, I believe it does. I copied the state of thread before this reply - that I'm writing right now, and will see how this reply changes things. -- GG
