* Guy Gold [2014.05.09 15:43]: > If," vim -c ':r /path/to/file' " is used, what happens in mutt > is, vim gets two files to edit, "/path/to/file" and > /tmp/mutt-muttfile.being.edited.
Not at all. Did you try it? You would have two files to edit if you did: vim -c ":e /path/to/file" or vim /path/to/file But not with: vim -c ":r /path/to/file" > I'm still far from solving this issue though, the initial !cat > works fine now, however- if I :wq from the editor into the 'ready > to send' screen in mutt, (where the From: and Subject: can be > edited), and, then I choose to go back an re-edit my email, the > !cat action takes place again - and that's not desired. Maybe have a different mapping for 'e' in the index versus the compose menu? -- JR
