On 07.05.13 15:32, Chris Green wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:49AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > REs would be preferable but it does provide "fuzzy" searchs
> >  
> Yes, I've used them occasionally, doesn't help with non alpha/number
> strings though.

Maybe I'm missing something, but backslash-escaping allows REs to match
non alpha/number characters just fine, I find. The trick is to stick with
EREs (egrep, grep -E), because the BREs used by some tools by default require
more (and different) escapes. (When you're whacking in a quick regex on
the command line, it's handy to be using the same variant as you used
last time.)

Erik

-- 
Arguing that Java is better than C++ is like arguing that grasshoppers
taste better than tree bark.                          - Thant Tessman

Reply via email to