* On 20 Feb 2013, s. keeling wrote: > Patrick is correct. It should be up to you to *request* a personal > Cc: if you want one. The list volume here is not that big that it's
I haven't kept up as much lately with email RFC as I used to, but I'm unaware of any standard means of *requesting* a cc (or of declaring any other reply policy, besides Reply-To:). This is a matter of interpretation, not of denotation. Mail-Followup-To is a good solution, but it is not defined by any RFC or standard, and as such cannot be relied upon as a means of requesting behavior from another party. I would love to agree with you, but lacking such a provision, I can't. In mutt, I always group-reply. If you don't like the copy, you can filter it. If someone else wants the copy, they can't fabricate it, so I make sure they get it. And if you provide MFT, it's honored. -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
