On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:05:34AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:24:38PM +0100, Chris Burdess wrote: > > I would think that it doesn't actually matter whether mutt does this or > > not, since any intervening MTAs are free to do this as they want. As > > long as the result is valid RFC822, header whitespace may be changed or > > whatever. Only the values are significant. > > I certainly agree. I guess I'm more or less curious why <tab> is being > replaced by <space>- what the logical argument is. Is the <tab> character > not a valid character in mail header fields as defined by the RFCs?
There's a lot to wade through, but the answer is here: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2995 It turns out this is kind of hard to get exactly right. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
pgpFewk1wX1VB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
