On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:24:38PM +0100, Chris Burdess wrote: > I would think that it doesn't actually matter whether mutt does this or > not, since any intervening MTAs are free to do this as they want. As > long as the result is valid RFC822, header whitespace may be changed or > whatever. Only the values are significant.
I certainly agree. I guess I'm more or less curious why <tab> is being replaced by <space>- what the logical argument is. Is the <tab> character not a valid character in mail header fields as defined by the RFCs? -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
