On 2010-07-28, Christoph Kukulies <k...@kukulies.org> wrote:
> Am 27.07.2010 23:57, schrieb Grant Edwards:
>> On 2010-07-27, Christoph Kukulies<k...@kukulies.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Everyone know this when you get an email from someone and he is
>>> disclosing his whole (Outlook) addressbook to the recipients. Often
>>> this is an interesting field for social research :) but that left
>>> aside, I would like avoid this in a case now when I'm about to send
>>> an information about an upcoming event to a list of about 100 users.
>>>
>>> Instead of going through a for i in `cat users`do mutt ... $i done
>>> loop I could make an alias of these users, but how do I tell to hide
>>> the 100 users and only show up the one addressee plus a note that
>>> the email went to a group of undisclosed users?
>>>
>> I assume you know it's not uncommon for people to route message like
>> that directly into the spam folder?
>>
>
> You mean the kind of messages with the hundreds of users in the Cc: ?
No, I mean the kind of messages that don't have my address as a
destination in the headers.
> That's among other reasons why I would like to avoid this case. Or do
> you mean my very post? :-)
No, I mean the sort of message you are trying to generate where the
recipieint's name/address doesn't show up anywhere in the headers.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm a GENIUS! I want
at to dispute sentence
gmail.com structure with SUSAN
SONTAG!!
