El dijous, 28 de agost del 2008 a les 15:22, Rado S va escriure: > =- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed 27.Aug'08 at 21:50:51 +0200 -= > > Is it possible to save two copies of sent messages? > > Currently: no. > As workaround you might hack your $sendmail to be a script which > does what you want before passing the content to the real > sendmail-binary. Take care of locking, since mutt doesn't care for > what sendmail does to folders.
El dilluns, 01 de setembre del 2008 a les 14:18, Cameron Simpson va escriure: > Another alternative, just as tricky, is to have mutt save to a "spool-out" > folder. Another process watches the spool-out folder for new messages and > files they according to whatever arcane scheme you desire. El dilluns, 01 de setembre del 2008 a les 16:52, Vincent van Leeuwen va escriure: > If you use \/ in a regular expression then procmail will put > everything that matches the regex after the \/ in $MATCH, which you can then > use in a delivery line. Not saying the OP should use this method, but > procmail > is definitely capable of performing this task. > > Something like this would work (untested and you probably want to extend it > quite a bit, but you get the idea): > > :0 > * ^To:\s*\/.*$ > saved-mail/$MATCH/ Thanks very much for the ideas. I am still mentally trapped in the idea that mutt has to do everything instead of integrating mutt with different tools. I now understand the multiple potentialities of mutt. >From what I understood, it would be possible: (a) to direct the "$sendmail" variable to a script that includes procmail as a mail filter. (b) mutt saves all mail to the same folder and procmail (from a cron job, for example) processes the mail in that folder. You have given me many options to work on :-) Much grateful! Cheers! -- Location: 41:24:51N (41.41417) 2:11:25E (2.1903) Linux User: #463211
