On 2007-03-21, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 20 at 10:38 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
> > Or, anything after -a and before any other token beginning with - is
> > considered an attachment.
>
> The only problem with this is that mutt uses the getopt() interface,
> which doesn't make this sort of thing easy (or possible).
Right. I wasn't wild about it for that reason, too. But I couldn't
think of anything better and if nothing else, I thought it might
stimulate someone else to come up with a better idea.
>
> > 4. mutt -s S -a A B C
> >
> > A is an attachment; B and C are recipients. (Same as current
> > behavior.)
>
> I don't understand, wouldn't (according to the idea you spelled out) B
> and C be considered attachments as well?
I expressed my idea incompletely. What I meant was:
If -a is followed by any other token beginning with -, all
tokens between -a and that '-'-token are taken to be
attachments.
If -a is not followed by any other token beginning with -, the
first token following -a is taken to be an attachment and all
subsequent tokens are taken to be recipients.
Regards,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA
