-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 20 at 10:38 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
> Or, anything after -a and before any other token beginning with - is
> considered an attachment.
The only problem with this is that mutt uses the getopt() interface,
which doesn't make this sort of thing easy (or possible).
> 4. mutt -s S -a A B C
>
> A is an attachment; B and C are recipients. (Same as current
> behavior.)
I don't understand, wouldn't (according to the idea you spelled out) B
and C be considered attachments as well?
~Kyle
- --
Testing can show the presence of errors, but not their absence.
-- E. W. Dijkstra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iD8DBQFGATmLBkIOoMqOI14RApqWAJ4rZ7nsUuKRc54I2OHX+Pi7xgeDUgCg03JS
4wfcRKRN81FE6bu9/q8PAnc=
=PdnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
