krjw wrote: > On 29082002 12:04:04 +0000, Will Yardley uttered: >> krjw wrote: >>> On 29082002 12:16:11 +0000, darren chamberlain uttered: >>> * krjw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 11:57]:
>>>>> 1) Firstly, does mutt support or will mutt ever support extended >>>>> maildirs? I've never seen extended maildirs 'till I started using >>>>> maildrop, but they're kinky. They allow for >>>>> folders-within-folders which is very handy. >>>> I don't know, but have you tried it? It seems like it would work. >>> Ya. I have a test maildir FOO, with a 'folder' bar, and bar has yet >>> another 'folder' called blah. The structure looks like this (as >>> created with the "maildirmake" prog that comes with maildrop): >> What if you change folders to .bar or .bar.blah/ ? I'm pretty sure >> that should work fine. > I can get into FOO/ but when attempting to get into .bar or .bar.blah > via the change-folder function, mutt declares it's not a mailbox. What if you set folder to FOO? ie: set spoolfile=~/FOO/ set folder=~/FOO/ However, i think 'baz' (in FOO/bar.baz/) will show up as FOO/bar.baz/ rather than as a subfolder of bar. Perhaps you'd rather use IMAP, although this probably has its own set of problems. -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
