On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:17:08PM -0230, Chad Young wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:20:22AM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:38:08PM -0230, Chad Young wrote: > > > > For me, just using "lists" gets me the sender's name, while > > > > using "subscribe" gets me "To <listname>". Unless there is > > > > something wrong with my setup somewhere, that definition is > > > > actually wrong. Substituting "subscribe" for "lists" would > > > > correct it. > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > But then you don't get that lists emails marked with L which I find > > > handy to see non maillist mail w/o setting up different mailboxes or > > > something. > > > > Well, you didn't send your message through the list, so that if > > I don't cc it to the list it won't show up as a list message. > > > > If I do cc it - and actually I sent if off without doing so but > > I wasn't dialled up so I stopped it in time and now I have to > > write it again - you should get your "L" if you've set "subscribe" > > but not if you've only set "lists", which seems reasonable, since > > if you're not subscribed, it's not really a message from one of > > "your" lists. > > > > So if you want your "L" you just have to set "subscribe". That > > %F or %L variable can be set as you like.
man muttrc and see the section "index_format". > > > > David > > > where do I set this %F or %L variable and what are they? %F =seen as > from the person? %L = as to or cc the list? > -- > If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding >if you don't eat your meat!
