On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:38:08PM -0230, Chad Young wrote: > > For me, just using "lists" gets me the sender's name, while > > using "subscribe" gets me "To <listname>". Unless there is > > something wrong with my setup somewhere, that definition is > > actually wrong. Substituting "subscribe" for "lists" would > > correct it. > > > > David > > > > > But then you don't get that lists emails marked with L which I find > handy to see non maillist mail w/o setting up different mailboxes or > something.
Well, you didn't send your message through the list, so that if I don't cc it to the list it won't show up as a list message. If I do cc it - and actually I sent if off without doing so but I wasn't dialled up so I stopped it in time and now I have to write it again - you should get your "L" if you've set "subscribe" but not if you've only set "lists", which seems reasonable, since if you're not subscribed, it's not really a message from one of "your" lists. So if you want your "L" you just have to set "subscribe". That %F or %L variable can be set as you like. David
