Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi,
Hello! % % * David T-G [2002-06-04 13:28:28 CEST] wrote: % > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % > % ...because I'm lazy. But I could think of other purposes as % > % well for a ``real'' batch mode, for example, when I want to % > % forward a bunch of mails to same address: inline and and one % > % by one. % % > Maybe a tag-prefix pipe-message thru formail -r and hand % > to sendmail? % % Wouldn't that send out just empty messages because I had no % chance putting in some text? Oh, right. Sorry. I often forward stuff without preamble anyway. % % > You could even throw it into the background, like I do % > with what I hand to Vipul's Razor. % % To clear things a little up, it was only a side note that % ``;'' can only perform an action on all tagged messages % while doing it one-by-one is not possible. Nothing more. Right. So you offload the one-by-one to something else... % % Anyway, let me add that it's kind of funny how creative some % people are in solving non-existing problems. ;-) Well, of course; those are the best, and nobody ever really disproves your solutions in practice! % % I think we can stop this discussion right now... No, wait! Not yet! % % Cheers, Rocco HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg28572/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
