Hi,

* Alain Bench [04/23/02 16:55:18 CEST] wrote:
>  On Monday, April 22, 2002 at 9:47:28 PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:

> > When I look at mails which verify okay with gpg, mutt sometimes says
> > the signature could not be verified.

>  -1) set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from" (or your real
> localized GnuPG output string)

That seems to work. According to the manual, gpg has to return an
exit value of non zero making mutt reporting a bad signature allthough
it's good.

So, this is not really a solution.

Cheers, Rocco.

Attachment: msg27566/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to