Eduardo --

...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
% 
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > 
% > ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
% > % 
...
% > OK.  But are they in the system Muttrc file?
% 
% yes. Now, i have removed the macros from muttrc, but they are still not
% working.

It was unlikely, but it doesn't really make sense to have them in two
places anyway, so it's a benefit overall.


% 
% > Let's see if you can define any macros at all.  What if you change the
% > key from <f1> to ,m or some such; does it show up then?
% 
% ok. With f1 or F1 the macro didn't work, but with ,m yes! I see a
% message 'Shell command: less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt' and when
% hit enter, the manual appear.

Quite interesting.  And did you define your ,m macro with a \n at the
end, or do we *expect* that you'd have to hit return?

Are you coming through a network connection or are you right on the box
where mutt is running?  What is your $TERM?  Have you checked to see how
it would pass a keypress of f1 outside of mutt?  What if you

  echo ^V<f1> | cat -v

at the command line, where that's a ctrl-v and then your f1 key?  Maybe
you can fake the f1 key with an esc-something macro once you see what
mutt, just like your shell, is getting.


% 
% -- 
% Eduardo Gargiulo
% ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org


HTH & HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G                      * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/    Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!

Attachment: msg27265/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to