Thomas Hurst said: > > > ><HEAD><DEFANGED_META HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" CONTENT="0" > > > >URL="http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/";></HEAD>
> > Really, is there some content that could be seen as "malicious" in > > this page? > Yes. The 0 means the refresh is instantanious, which breaks the back > button on most browsers. > This is why HTTP supports redirection; meta refresh is a lame-ass hack, > and should be avoided, especially in these circumstances. Yes, indeed. But on this page, there are only _two_ META tags: <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name="author" content="Cedric Duval"> The first is required for valid html, and the second... well, while certainly useless, I don't think it will do much harm. If you see a meta refresh somewhere, it does not originate from my code, but from _your_ proxy. -- Cedric
