* On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 04:56:14PM +0100,
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> »Nicolas Rachinsky« sagte am 2002-03-10 um 16:40:27 +0100 :
> > Does the above command (between the `) produce one line or one line
> > per Mailbox? AFAIK only the first line of output of the command
> > between the backticks is used by mutt. Does mutt recognize new Mail
> > if you add the folders by hand. I'm not sure, but could it be,
> > that you need a complete path after the mailboxes command ("=list"
> > would be a complete path, because of the =).
>
> The above command did generate one extra long line - ie. all the
> directories on one line. And it did generate it like
What type of find are you using? If I try your commands, I always get
multiple lines as output.
> "/home/askwar/Maildir/foo /home/askwar/Maildir/bar".
should have seen this.
> However, I've now "tweaked" the script a little, and it now generates
> this:
>
[...]
>
> In my muttrc, I've got:
> set folder=~/Maildir
>
> Also with "set folder=/home/askwar/Maildir" and with "set
> folder=/home/askwar/Maildir/" I don't get mutt to announce new mails in
> the Maildirs.
>
> =+Daemon_Mails is correct "shorthand" for
> /home/askwar/Maildir/Daemon_Mails, if folder=~/Maildir, is it not?
> Reading Roland Rosenfelds muttrc at www.spinnaker.de/mutt/muttrc, I
> think it is.
I don't think so, =Daemon_Mails or +Daemon_Mails would be ok, but not
=+Daemon_Mails.
Nicolas
