* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 22. 2002 05:21]: > ...and then Brian Clark said...
> % Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact quote prefix* :-) It'd take me > % forever to find the thread in the archives because I wouldn't know > % what to look > Not so tough; just surf over to the archives site and look for that > exact string. asdfghjhkl.. Not that exact string <bg>, but something equally as silly. You get the idea -- I was trying to get the point across without knowing exactly what the quote prefix was. OK, everyone confused yet? :-)) > % for, but it was the thread where someone was picking on Dave's (%) > % quote prefix. (I gather this isn't the first time someone on the > % list has picked on him about that prefix. ;-)) > It has been rather brutal lately, but, interestingly enough, all I > ever got were a few polite questions about it before that. There was > some sort of worldwide change and all of a sudden everybody loves to > hate me! Well, FWIW, I could care less about your quote prefix, unless you happen to change it to: o/ \o o/ Which I saw earlier, coming from your client, so don't even think about it! :-) -- Brian Clark | Avoiding the general public since 1805! Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8 Earth first! We'll strip-mine the other planets later.
