On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:23:48AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Angelika -- > > ...and then Schnagl, Angelika said... > % Hi, on 7-Dez-2001 I wrote: > % > % > Hallo Thorsten, Du schriebst am 06-Dez-2001: > % > > ... > % > > Thorsten > % > > -- > % > > Content-Type: text/plain > % > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > % > > > % > > [Filename: LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs, Content-Type: UUEncoded] > % > > % > Du hast mit dieser Mail den Virus LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs > ... > % > % Sorry for my writing before thinking. I really thought there > % were great danger ... > > No problem :-) > > I'm curious: why did your version of mutt come up with the descriptive > string you show above? I only saw his signature, and I see nothing to > indicate that it is an attachment... > >
It was encoded using the old-style UUENCODE. If you pipe the mail through uudecode, it should pick it up. Angelika must have a setup which recognises this. - Paul -- Paul Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
