Justin --
...and then Justin R. Miller said...
...
% Mutt problem, but I'd like to learn what the deal is either way and this
% list has the kind of people who tend to know this stuff :->
*grin*
%
% I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results
Good for you!
% in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the
% signature. Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I
% take it means that the MUA is supposed to display the attachment inline,
% since both are of type text/plain.
Yep.
%
% Anyway, I just got a mail from a user on a rather low-tech mailing list
% complaining that all of my mail comes up blank with two attachments --
% the two parts mentioned above. She's using:
%
% X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
Ha ha ha hahahahaha ;-)
%
% I'll bet my life savings on which one of us has the real problem :-D
% Regardless, I was wondering if anyone would be able to confirm for me
% what exactly that is?
LookOut! is just stupid; you're right.
If you know you're sending to Outhouse users, you can set your
$pgp_create_traditional to help, but they still won't be able to see
the message in the preview pane, IIRC.
Shane Wegener's pgp_outlook_compat patch is excellent for this, and I've
used it quite happily. It manages to so brutally mangle your outgoing
message that it's visible on the other end.
See my posting of a few minutes ago for a URL.
%
% Thanks in advance!
HTH & HAND
%
% --
% | Justin R. Miller / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 0xC9C40C31
% | Of all the things I've lost, I miss my pants the most.
% ----------------------------------------------------------
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
PGP signature
