Louis, et al --
...and then Louis LeBlanc said...
% How about piping those messages thru a procmail script? It may
...
% up with such a procmailrc, a macro could be used to pipe it through
% procmail, and delete the current one. Of course this is on the
I'm thinking more along the lines of formail, but I bet you're right.
% assumption that you are using imap or a mailbox format that will allow
% you to bring in the first message of a thread 'after' the rest of the
% thread.
%
% Maybe nothing there, but . . .
% Someone tell me if this is totally bogus, I'm almost talked into it.
I'm sure not speaking up; I want you to put it together ;-)
%
% L
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
PGP signature
