On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:28:24PM -0400, Andy Wingo wrote:
> I was actually wondering the same thing and would be interested in the
> answer as well. I was thinking perhaps an isync-style synchronization
> with a local maildir, then running procmail (or some homebrewed script),
> then resynchronizing with the imap folders, but it seems like a lot of
> bandwidth for simple filtering. Although, the synchronizations could be
> written to process the spool mailbox first then to sync only your
> 'target' filter folders. Any more thoughts from the IMAP gurus?
I would suggest using Mutt's scoring with an appropriate $score_threshold_delete
value. This should just as well for IMAP mailboxes as any other type of
filtering. I thought about building something into isync, but this would
really be a duplication of what already exists in Mutt.
me
